ruth_s_autograph_book

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
ruth_s_autograph_book [2025/02/04 09:31] judithruth_s_autograph_book [2025/02/04 09:34] (current) judith
Line 2: Line 2:
 Emma and Fiona Cullen-Ward have a battered album that we would call an autograph book. {{:cover_c_14.4_x_11cmscan_20241206.jpg?200|}}It is 11 x 14.5cm and contains signatures and sketches both on its pages and as loose additions. There are also loose photos tucked into the album. I have put the names of those who signed in bold for easier identification.\\ Emma and Fiona Cullen-Ward have a battered album that we would call an autograph book. {{:cover_c_14.4_x_11cmscan_20241206.jpg?200|}}It is 11 x 14.5cm and contains signatures and sketches both on its pages and as loose additions. There are also loose photos tucked into the album. I have put the names of those who signed in bold for easier identification.\\
 \\ \\
-The best indication of its owner is the following page: {{:to_ruth_scan_20241206_3_.jpg?200|}} It reads: 'To Ruth. I love you. Not because your face is fair/And sweet & gentle too. But because you are yourself/So good & kind and true. **Jo[or Lo?] Collingridge**. "St Cloud" Ryde 11th Feb. 1901." This declaration narrows the ownership to Ruth and almost certainly to Ruth Murray-Prior. It is also a reminder that we can be more inhibited than our forebears because our society is more sexualised. So this open and quite public declaration of love could be lesbian (at a time when homosexuality was illegal and largely considered deviant), but more likely referred to an openly loving friendship. The little book has another contribution by **Jo[Lo?] Collingridge** - this drawing of a Japanese musician: {{:japanese_drawing_scan_20241206_2_.jpg?400|}} The Collingridge family who lived at St Cloud were Arthur and his wife Margaret and their 12 surviving children. The identity of the person is unclear. The assumption is that a young man who not write such a declaration unless they were family or engaged/married.   That leaves 4 possibilities as Arthur and Margaret only had 4 daughters: Maud b.1874; Louisa (known in the family as Googs); Mary (known in the family as Bobbie); and Anne (known in the family as Darkie.((Winsome Collingridge, email to J. Godden,3/2/2025)) The closest possibility is that it was Louisa signing herself as 'Lo' - her nickname Googs was perhaps just for her family to use.\\+The best indication of its owner is the following page: {{:to_ruth_scan_20241206_3_.jpg?200|}} It reads: 'To Ruth. I love you. Not because your face is fair/And sweet & gentle too. But because you are yourself/So good & kind and true. **Jo [or Lo?] Collingridge**. "St Cloud" Ryde 11th Feb. 1901." This declaration narrows the ownership to Ruth and almost certainly to Ruth Murray-Prior. It is also a reminder that we can be more inhibited than our forebears because our society is more sexualised. So this open and quite public declaration of love could be lesbian (at a time when homosexuality was illegal and considered deviant), but more likely referred an openly loving friendship. The little book has another contribution by **Jo [Lo?] Collingridge** - this drawing of a Japanese musician: {{:japanese_drawing_scan_20241206_2_.jpg?400|}} The Collingridge family who lived at St Cloud were Arthur and his wife Margaret and their 12 surviving children. The identity of the person is unclear. My assumption is that a young man would not write such a declaration unless they were family or engaged/married. That leaves 4 possibilities as Arthur and Margaret only had 4 daughters: Maud b.1874; Louisa b.1875 (known in the family as Googs); Mary b. 1877 (known in the family as Bobbie); and Anne b. 1880 (known in the family as Darkie.((Winsome Collingridge, email to J. Godden,3/2/2025)) The most likely of these is Louisa signing herself as 'Lo' - her nickname Googs was perhaps just for her family to use.\\
 \\ \\
 That there are so many sketches in this small album indicates how art was valued by Ruth, her family and friends including the Collingridge family- see [[http://www.ryde.nsw.gov.au/Library/Local-and-Family-History/Historic-Ryde/Historic-Figures/Arthur-Collingridge|Ryde Library]]. It is not known if Ruth herself drew or whether she concentrated her talents on writing. This album are not about masterpieces nor professional artists; rather it indicates the enjoyment amateur artists and others gained from creating and treasuring art.\\ That there are so many sketches in this small album indicates how art was valued by Ruth, her family and friends including the Collingridge family- see [[http://www.ryde.nsw.gov.au/Library/Local-and-Family-History/Historic-Ryde/Historic-Figures/Arthur-Collingridge|Ryde Library]]. It is not known if Ruth herself drew or whether she concentrated her talents on writing. This album are not about masterpieces nor professional artists; rather it indicates the enjoyment amateur artists and others gained from creating and treasuring art.\\
  • ruth_s_autograph_book.1738621860.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/02/04 09:31
  • by judith