priors_in_england

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
priors_in_england [2018/02/20 21:05] judithpriors_in_england [2019/02/24 18:26] (current) judith
Line 3: Line 3:
 To thrive, it helped if families kept on the winning side of royal politics: as the Priors found, this was not always easy and could depend on luck as well as religious inclinations. This brief account of the Prior/Priorur/Priour family in England during these turbulent centuries is taken from TLM-P's Family Bibles and other publications, with the common source appearing to be John & John B. Burke's //A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain & Ireland: M to Z//, London: Henry Colburn Publisher, 1846, pp.1075-76.\\ To thrive, it helped if families kept on the winning side of royal politics: as the Priors found, this was not always easy and could depend on luck as well as religious inclinations. This brief account of the Prior/Priorur/Priour family in England during these turbulent centuries is taken from TLM-P's Family Bibles and other publications, with the common source appearing to be John & John B. Burke's //A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Landed Gentry of Great Britain & Ireland: M to Z//, London: Henry Colburn Publisher, 1846, pp.1075-76.\\
  
-We trace just one line, that of John Priorur who had a charter from [[wp>https://Henry_III_of_England|Henry III]] and performed the necessary homage to his king in 1218.((e.g.http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~lpproots/Pryor/pryor_manuscript.htm)) Burke states that the charter was still valid 220 years later though the surname was then spelt Priour (note that it was only in recent times that spelling, even for surnames, was standardised). +Here we trace just one line of our many ancestors, that of John Priorur who had a charter from [[wp>Henry_III_of_England|Henry III]] and performed the necessary homage to his king in 1218.((e.g.http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~lpproots/Pryor/pryor_manuscript.htm)) Burke states that the charter was still valid 220 years later though the surname was then spelt Priour (note that it was only in recent times that spelling, even for surnames, was standardised). According to Burke, John Priorur died circa 1253 and was succeeded by his eldest son Thomas.
  
 {{https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/HenryIII.jpg/220px-HenryIII.jpg?300x300|}} {{https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/HenryIII.jpg/220px-HenryIII.jpg?300x300|}}
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 **Passion and Pardon:** **Passion and Pardon:**
-One of John Priour’s direct descendants, ‘Thomas Priour de Exnynge’ was involved in what Burke called the ‘fatal affair of [[wp>Piers_Gaveston,_1st_Earl_of_Cornwall|Piers de Gaveston’]]  – the murder of [[wp>Edward_II_of_England|King Edward II]]’s favourite and, some maintain, lover. On 16 October 1313, the Duke of Lancaster and some 250 men who were involved, including Thomas Priour, were given a free pardon. The same year, Thomas Priour had sufficiently redeemed himself to become a member of parliament representing the southern English county of [[wp>Hertford|Hertford]]. +One of John and Thomas Priour’s direct descendants, ‘Thomas Priour de Exnynge’ acquired 'considerable property under the Earl of Lancaster'. He was therefore involved in what Burke called the ‘fatal affair of [[wp>Piers_Gaveston,_1st_Earl_of_Cornwall|Piers de Gaveston’]]  – the murder of [[wp>Edward_II_of_England|King Edward II]]’s favourite and, some maintain, lover. On 16 October 1313, the Duke of Lancaster and some 250 men involved, including Thomas Priour, were given a free pardon. The same year, Thomas Priour had sufficiently redeemed himself to become a member of parliament representing the southern English county of [[wp>Hertford|Hertford]]. His younger brother John Priour was sheriff of London.
  
-**Seizing the moment!:** Either the same Thomas Priour or his son Thomas had the good fortune to be admitted as a witness to the birth in 1330 by the wife of [[wp>Edward_III_of_England|King Edward III]], the 15 year-old [[wp>Philippa_of_Hainault|Queen Philippa]]. This Thomas smartly rode to tell the King that he had a ‘fair, lusty and well shaped infant’ and, most importantly at the time, an heir. Priour was consequently awarded with money and later land – an outcome that was unlikely if the baby had been a girl. Priour stayed in favour with the monarch and was reportedly one of 74 courtiers who accompanied Queen Philippa when she travelled to Europe in 1338.+**Seizing the moment!:** Either the same Thomas Priour or his son Thomas had the good fortune to be admitted as a witness to the birth in 1330 by the wife of [[wp>Edward_III_of_England|King Edward III]], the 15 year-old [[wp>Philippa_of_Hainault|Queen Philippa]]. This Thomas smartly rode to tell the King that he had a ‘fair, lusty and well shaped infant’ and, most importantly at the time, a male heir. Priour was consequently awarded with money and later land – an outcome that was unlikely if the baby had been a girl. Priour stayed in favour with the monarch and was reportedly one of 74 courtiers who accompanied Queen Philippa when she travelled to Europe in 1338.
  
-**Favour and disfavour:** Burke also records that the Priour family gained more land in 1437 under [[wp>Henry_VI_of_England|Henry VI]] though the reason for the grant is not recorded. The Family Bible states that the land was granted to Richard Priour and his wife Alianora: this seems unusual, perhaps explained by his wife having the prime claim to the grant. Keeping estates could be as tricky as getting them: the Priour lands were confiscated during the [[wp>Wars_of_the_Roses|War of the Roses]] - it did not do to be on the losing side of royal conflicts - but the family obtained other estates under the patronage of Edward, Duke of Buckingham. Then things took a turn for the worse again: the Priours had adopted their monarch’s Protestant faith, so had their estates confiscated during the 1553-58 reign of the Catholic [[wp>Mary_I_of_England|Queen Mary]]. One of the family, [[priors_in_ireland_1636-c.1803|Richard Prior]], then obtained land at [[wp>Cambridge|Cambridge]] in eastern England. After Mary was succeeded by her Protestant half-sister [[wp>Elizabeth_I_of_England| Elizabeth I]], the family appeared to prosper with lands in Ely as well as Cambridge.\\+**Favour and disfavour:** Burke records that Richard Priour and his wife Alianora gained more land in 1437 under [[wp>Henry_VI_of_England|Henry VI]] though the reason for the grant is not recorded. That his wife was included seems unusual, perhaps explained by her having the prime claim to the grant. Keeping estates could be as tricky as getting them: the Priour lands were confiscated during the [[wp>Wars_of_the_Roses|War of the Roses]] - it did not do to be on the losing side of royal conflicts - but the family obtained other estates under the patronage of Edward, Duke of Buckingham. Then things took a turn for the worse again: the Priours had adopted their monarch’s Protestant faith, so had their estates confiscated during the 1553-58 reign of the Catholic [[wp>Mary_I_of_England|Queen Mary]]. One of the family, now spelling his surname the modern way, was [[priors_in_ireland_1636-c.1803|Richard Prior]]. He obtained land at [[wp>Cambridge|Cambridge]] in eastern England. After Mary was succeeded by her Protestant half-sister [[wp>Elizabeth_I_of_England| Elizabeth I]], the family appeared to prosper with lands in Ely as well as Cambridge.\\
 {{https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Darnley_stage_3.jpg?250x500|}} //Image of Elizabeth I (reigned 1533–1603)//  {{https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Darnley_stage_3.jpg?250x500|}} //Image of Elizabeth I (reigned 1533–1603)// 
  
-**Robert Prior** (1576-1644).((Teddy Fennelly, //Thomas Prior. His Life, Times and Legacy//, Ireland: Arderin Publishing, 2001, p.81.))His will showed that he lived in Ely and also owned land in Cambridge. This property was presumably based on the original holding obtained by Richard Prior (above) almost a century previously. Robert Prior had his will proved [our equivalent of probate] at Oxford on 11 April 1644.((Burkes landed? gentry, entry for Prior of Netherfield)) In the entry TLM-P prepared for Burke's //Colonial Gentry//, he was said to have left an unnamed widow, daughter and son Thomas.((Burke's Colonial Gentry, p.51.)) +**Robert Prior** (1576-1644).((Teddy Fennelly, //Thomas Prior. His Life, Times and Legacy//, Ireland: Arderin Publishing, 2001, p.81.)) His will showed that he lived in Ely and also owned land in Cambridge. This property was presumably based on the original holding obtained by Richard Priour (above) almost a century previously. Robert Prior had his will proved [our equivalent of probate] at Oxford on 11 April 1644.((Burkes //Landed Gentry//, entry for Prior of Netherfield)) In the entry TLM-P prepared for Burke's //Colonial Gentry//, Robert Prior was said to have left an widow, daughter and son Thomas.((Burke'//Colonial Gentry//, p.51. Neither women were identified by name.)) 
  
 // Map showing Ely. Cambridge is around 27km south.// {{https://ely.org.uk/pics/ukmapmg.gif?direct&300|  }}  // Map showing Ely. Cambridge is around 27km south.// {{https://ely.org.uk/pics/ukmapmg.gif?direct&300|  }} 
- 
  
  
  
  
  • priors_in_england.1519121120.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2018/02/20 21:05
  • by judith